PlantPeople

PLANT // PEOPLE

Pondering plants and the people who study them.

Pokémon Go's Missed Opportunity

7/11/2016

3 Comments

 
​[Anna writes…] A few days ago I shared with you all the great opportunity that I think ​video games could serve in connecting people with nature. I wrote that post a week or two ago, and just so happened to post and share right in time for the explosion of Pokémon Go after its release last Wednesday.
​Unlike apparently everyone on the internet, I haven’t had very much time to play (seriously, you guys, did you take off work or what?) but I’m getting the hang of it.

Pokémon, for those of us never blessed with a Gameboy, is a game where you collect creatures (the original game had 150 “species”) which you can carry around in your pockets in magical Pokéballs. These Pokémon are highly respected as they are trained for battle*. Towns have gyms in which you can train your Pokémon, and if you beat a gym’s leader, you receive a badge which adds to your Pokémon trainer cred. Collect all the badges, collect all the Pokémon, and you’re officially “the very best, like no one ever was” (lyrics from the theme song).

In Pokémon Go, the new mobile game, Pokémon, gyms, and shops are scattered across real-life cities, so players have to physically walk around outside to make progress. Some Pokémon are only found in certain habitats, so to catch water-type Pokémon, players might need to travel to a local water body.

But notice how I said “cities.”
I downloaded the app last Thursday, excited for motivation to take a long overdue jog. I wandered around my house and yard at my university’s field station, trying to get enough of a feel for gameplay to decide if I could actually use the game on a run. But there were no Pokémon. I thought maybe I just needed to travel further, so I laced up my shoes and headed out with the app running. ​

I jumped on the North Country trail (which goes right past my house) and ran for about 10 minutes. No Pokémon. I ran back. Nothing. Wondering if I was playing incorrectly, I went to the internet. Facebook told me that all my friends were finding Pokémon in their living rooms. Much to my dismay, a Google search told me that I was playing correctly, there just weren’t (m)any Pokémon in rural areas.

This was a HUGE disappointment. Not just because I don’t get to play like my city-based friends, but because I THOUGHT THAT WAS GOING TO BE THE WHOLE POINT OF THE GAME. I was mislead by the “water-types only found by water” claim, and thought people would have to search for wild Pokémon IN THE ACTUAL WILD.  
Picture
Here I am, in my house. Looking for... anything.
Not so.

​You can’t even play in the actual wild. Rural players will have to go to town if they want Gyms or Pokéstops—sometimes even to find Pokémon.

​How did this happen? Gyms and Pokéstops are tied to points of interest populated by users for a previous Nianatic game called Ingress. These “portals” had 
specific criteria: historical landmarks, places of worship, local gathering spots, etc. No natural landmarks. This makes them sparse to non-existent in remote areas, while cities can have many per block.

​ As for the lack of Pokémon themselves, one friend told me that the density of Pokémon in an area is related to how many people are using the app nearby, while another thought they were tied to city greenspaces (I hear Chicago’s Lake Shore is bursting). 
​One thing is certain: you'll find more Pokémon in Central Park than a National Park.
Picture
A few screenshots from friends playing Pokémon Go. The floating blue cubes are Pokéstops. Confetti means a player has placed a lure at the stop, attracting even more Pokémon to the area. The taller structures are gyms, where players have to go to train and battle. Left, Houston. Center, Michigan State University campus. Right, Chicago. (Thanks Janet, Emily, and Dave for the screenshots).
Meanwhile, Twitter’s ecologist contingent has found out about the game, and is now bursting with commentary ranging from the snarky (“wait, you guys know there are real species out there, right?”) to the actually helpful (use #Pokeblitz to document the real wildlife you encounter while playing Pokémon Go). One user has even started compiling a Pokédex of real-world species (#PokemonIRL).

This attention is great—but I get the feeling the ecologists-who-aren’t-playing-Pokémon-Go crowd doesn’t realize that players are confined to cities. 

Don’t get me wrong, I love this game. I love the concept. People are getting off their butts and going for a walk. People are making friends at their neighborhood Pokéstop. The internet is exploding with stories of the crazy things happening (good and bad) thanks to the game.
​
But I still feel this deep disappointment in the fact that instead of drawing people outside and into local natural areas, people are drawn to city centers.

Why not have more Pokémon in the wild, and gyms in cities, like in the original game? Pokémon Go would have a very different kind of impact if this had were the case. Perhaps it wouldn’t have become popular at all if cities only had rats and pigeons (Rattatas and Pidgeys, that is) and you had to travel a bit to catch anything less common. But I would’ve liked to see it try.

​The fact remains that people just don't care about the natural world unless they experience it first-hand. It's hard to cultivate the sort of passion the world needs to really make a difference. Pokémon Go could've been a step toward rebuilding that relationship, but instead will continue to keep city people in cities.

Maybe the next AR mobile game will take the next step and find a way to get players back into nature. 


****

*I feel compelled to mention that Pokémon isn't the sort of inhumane dog-fighting ring it might seem. This subject is really well addressed in the T.V. show. Villains in the show are often trainers who work their Pokémon too hard, or give their Pokémon poor living conditions, or otherwise don’t respect them. It’s all very pro-Pokémon rights. 


3 Comments
Nik McPherson
7/12/2016 04:54:40 pm

I definitely agree. There are so many way this could have been even cooler and better than it is. Apparently they actually turned off submissions for Ingress portals about 6 months ago and, while they want to find a way to re-enable them, apparently they were too labor-intensive to keep going. And that's for Ingress; for Pokemon Go, they're unsure if they're ever going to open submissions.

Even if the stops and gyms are tied to man-made points of interest, it seems really, really strange to me that they don't just spread Pokemon out all over. If they're bothering to tie the Pokemon distribution to the local landscape it seems strange that they wouldn't put certain more "nature-y" Pokemon out in nature and more "city" Pokemon in cities. At this point there's only the original 150, so there might not be enough Pokemon for this yet, but if they have plans to add more and allow people to trade their Pokemon, imagine the scenario:

You go to a family reunion or a relative's birthday over the summer. They have a bunch of ground, flying, and poison-type Pokemon from their job and around their apartment in Chicago and you have a bunch of grass-, water-, and some rock-types from your job at a field site. You do some trading, they tell you stories about the place they caught them (which is tracked by the game), you tell them stories about the places you caught yours. You show them some cool pictures of your site and the plants/animals there, one of which might actually resemble a Pokemon you caught there.

Anyway, Pokemon Go is a combination of several things I'm really fond of and the implementation felt really flat to me in a lot of ways. Niantic say they want to do some sort of update every two weeks, so I'm hopeful. We'll see if/how long it takes to get to the point where it feels really good and everyone can actually play it. I hope people haven't lost interest by then. Public interest is notoriously fragile.

Here's the interview I pulled some information from for my comment, as well: http://www.gameinformer.com/b/features/archive/2016/07/11/pokemon-go-team-discusses-successes-challenges-and-the-future-niantic.aspx

Reply
Nash Turley link
7/17/2016 01:00:24 pm

The little park in downtown kalamazoo was packed on friday night and it took me a while to realize why. But everyone was playing pokemon. I was there showing a friend all the cool trees and cultivated plants. I was thrilled to find a tulip poplar and ran and caught a scarab beetle that was flying around. We stopped and smelled all the flowers and touched and smelled the leaves. Seems like seeking out cool nature finds in the park was a similar experience as all the pokemoners but I couldn't help feeling more engaged with the world than all the people wandering around looking at their phones. On a similar note, this park was probably mostly empty on a friday night just a few weeks ago. It is interesting to think all these people might now have an interest in preserving this park should the city want to get rid of it. Would be nice if pokemon could get more people to want to conserve wildlife areas.

Reply
John
7/27/2016 10:11:53 am

One thing that the birding community is talking about in the wake of Pokemon Go is how similar it can be to birding. Maybe it can lead to more birders, which is always a good thing. For a couple of external blog posts about birding and Pokemon Go, see below:
http://blog.aba.org/2016/07/open-mic-birds-of-a-feather-birding-and-pokemon.html

http://www.nemesisbird.com/birding/pokemon-go-birding/

Reply



Leave a Reply.


    Andy on Twitter
    Anna on Twitter
    Nate on Twitter

    This site is no longer regularly updated, but if you're an early-career plant scientist with something to say, you're welcome (and encouraged!) to submit a post. Contact Anna Funk using this form for information.

    Archives

    July 2020
    March 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    February 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    December 2015
    August 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015

    Categories

    All
    Academia
    Anna's Research
    Birds
    Blog Updates
    Careers
    Climate Change
    Data & Statistics
    Ecological Restoration
    Ecology
    ESA
    Evolution
    External Posts
    Faith+Science
    Field Work
    Food
    Gardening
    GMOs
    Grad School
    Guest Post
    Meyers-Briggs
    Miley Cyrus
    Natural History
    Nature
    Outreach
    Plant Breeding
    Plants
    Pokémon
    Pokémon Go
    Published Research
    Science Communication
    Science News
    Scientific Meetings
    Scientists
    Teaching
    The Legend Of Zelda
    Twitter
    UpGoer Five
    Video Games
    Wildflowers
    Wine

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.